Anyone who uses WhatsApp for business purposes passes on the contact details of colleagues, customers, and partners to a provider whose data-processing practices their organisation can neither control nor document. Nevertheless, the company remains responsible for this data. Furthermore, WhatsApp cannot be administered centrally, offers no sophisticated structure for secure and independent communication, and provides no functions whatsoever for emergency and crisis communication.
And yet WhatsApp has long been a standard tool in many teams: shift groups, project chats, quick coordination with field staff. Does this sound familiar from your own organisation?
A WhatsApp alternative for businesses combines the familiar WhatsApp user experience with centralised management, business identities, controlled data storage, and traceable documentation. Below, we’ll show why WhatsApp has limitations for businesses and public sector organisations, and outline the ten criteria you should use to select the right solution.
Key points at a glance
- WhatsApp is designed for private individuals and, at most, for customer communication; it is not intended for internal collaboration under the organisation’s control. Contact synchronisation, the lack of centralised management and the lack of archiving are typical sticking points.
- The right WhatsApp alternative depends on the specific use case: internal team communication, customer contact and critical communication all require different features. However, a suitable solution can comprehensively cover all of these.
- The selection is based on ten criteria: hosting and data control, suitability for everyday use, administration, identity and login, devices and BYOD, security and evidence, archiving and retention, integrations, emergency availability, and support.
- Ease of use is not a subjective criterion. If the alternative is more cumbersome than WhatsApp, WhatsApp will remain in use.
- A proof of concept (PoC) can show whether a solution works in one’s day-to-day work.
Side note: Why businesses need a WhatsApp alternative
WhatsApp is not banned across the board within the organisation. The question is which version is used for which purpose, and whether the organisation can fulfil the associated obligations.
At this point, we would like to recommend the following articles for further details:
- WhatsApp & the GDPR: What businesses need to bear in mind
- WhatsApp for staff communication: What companies need to bear in mind
- The disadvantages of WhatsApp in a business setting: a 10-point overview
- WhatsApp ban at work: How to put clear rules in place
Before making a choice: What communication needs should the alternative meet?
Before comparing solutions, you should describe what the alternative is intended to achieve. Is it about enabling rapid communication between staff in the office? Do you need to reach mobile teams, shift workers and sites without fixed workstations? Or are you also looking for a channel that works even when email and internal systems are down?
The answers to these questions will determine your choice. A system for customer service requires different functions to a platform for internal collaboration. And a messaging app that works well in day-to-day work does not automatically meet the requirements for alerting or business continuity.
You should therefore first establish which employees and organisational units are to communicate and on which devices they work. Clarify which processes and information will flow through the channel and which existing systems need to be integrated.
Finally, describe what absolutely must continue to function in the event of a disruption or crisis. These answers will reveal which of the following criteria are particularly important to you.
WhatsApp alternatives for businesses: the 10 key selection criteria
1. Hosting, data control and regulatory compliance
Check which operating models a provider supports: public cloud, private cloud or on-premises. Clarify where data is processed and stored, who has administrative access and what contractual terms apply. No single hosting model is automatically the best for every organisation. The decisive factors are security requirements, operational costs, procurement rules and existing infrastructure.
When it comes to cloud services, ask specifically about regulatory requirements rather than relying on buzzwords. Under Article 28 of the GDPR, you need a data processing agreement that discloses any sub-processors. If data is processed outside the EU or if a provider is part of a US group, the rules on transfers to third countries under Article 44 et seq. of the GDPR and the issue of the CLOUD Act apply.
In Germany, the BSI’s C5 criteria catalogue has become established as the standard for demonstrating a cloud service’s security. A C5 certificate confirms that a cloud service has been assessed in accordance with this catalogue. For organisations falling within the scope of NIS-2, Article 21 of the Directive also explicitly lists secure voice, video and text communications, as well as secure emergency communication systems where applicable, as required measures.
2. Suitability for everyday use and introduction
WhatsApp has set the benchmark for what people expect from a messaging app. If the alternative is more cumbersome, staff will keep using their personal mobile phones, and shadow IT will persist. Usability is therefore a security criterion, not merely a matter of convenience.
Assess mobile and desktop applications with the same range of features, including synchronised chats across all devices, group and distribution list functions, and the ability to share photos, files and voice messages. Test usability under real-world conditions, including whilst wearing gloves, during shift changes or when network coverage is poor. Also factor in the implementation costs: training, responsibilities and communication with staff are all part of the selection process.
3. Centralised administration and user lifecycle
The organisation must be able to track at all times who has access and which rights or group memberships have been assigned. Check how new staff members can be invited, how changes in roles are managed, and how access can be revoked immediately upon leaving the organisation. It should be possible to manage groups and distribution lists centrally, not just by individual users. Larger organisations with multiple subsidiaries or sites should also consider whether individual units can be managed separately.
4. Identities and registration
Clarify how user accounts are created and authenticated. Is it possible to use business identities without using personal telephone numbers as identifiers? Can an existing directory be integrated? What procedures are in place for single sign-on and multi-factor authentication?
5. Device management and Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)
If employees use their own smartphones, clearly separate business and personal use. Check for support for Mobile Device Management (MDM) and Enterprise Mobility Management, app configuration, access restrictions and procedures for dealing with lost devices.
BYOD is not a reason for exclusion. Whether it is suitable depends on security requirements, device configuration and internal policies.
6. Safety and evidence
Compare specific measures rather than buzzwords: encryption during transmission and at rest, privacy by design and by default, protection of accounts and devices, authorisation models, security updates and independent audits. Also ask whether the provider analyses usage behaviour or collects metadata beyond what is necessary for the operation of the service.
When it comes to certificates and attestations, pay attention to their scope. An ISO 27001 certification relates to an information security management system, whilst a C5 attestation relates to a cloud service. Neither constitutes a blanket statement about every product component or every use case.
7. Archiving, auditing and retention
Define whether business content must be documented, exported or accessible to specific roles. Also specify which content is to be retained for how long and when it should be deleted. Bear in mind legal regulations such as NIS-2, DORA and the GDPR.
Specify which business content must be documented, exported or made traceable for specific roles, and when it is to be deleted. The legal framework comprises, in particular, the retention periods for commercial and business correspondence, as well as the storage limits and deletion obligations under the GDPR. In certain sectors, additional obligations apply, such as DORA for the financial sector. Under NIS-2, you must be able to report and trace security incidents. This also includes how communication took place during the incident.
8. Integrations and interoperability
A communication solution does not need to replace every line-of-business application. However, it should be capable of integrating where information or processes need to be exchanged between systems. Check the available APIs, bots, directory connections and – where relevant – options for communicating across organisational boundaries.
It is important that the organisation controls which integrations are permitted and which data they access, as every interface also represents a potential data leak.
9. Availability and emergency communications
If communication is part of operational capability, you need clear requirements for disruptions and exceptional circumstances. Imagine a specific scenario: following a cyber-attack, networks are isolated, and email and collaboration tools are no longer available. These are precisely the channels that would be needed to coordinate recovery.
You should therefore check whether the solution functions as an independent fallback channel outside your own infrastructure. Clarify how messages are prioritised, how recipients are reliably reached and how feedback is recorded. What emergency functions do you need, such as alerts, push-to-talk or live location tracking? Also assess dependencies on networks, end devices and areas of responsibility. No messaging app can replace a tested communication and emergency plan.
10. Support and service
Ask about support hours, language, escalation procedures and contractually agreed service levels. With on-premises solutions, responsibilities are distributed differently than with a cloud service. It is crucial that the support aligns with your protection requirements and operational organisation, particularly when swift action is required in an emergency.
Additional points for public authorities to bear in mind
The same ten criteria apply to public authorities and public institutions, although some carry greater weight. Public procurement law governs procurement. This means requirements must be set out early and in a verifiable way before a tender or framework agreement is issued.
Many public authorities follow the BSI’s IT-Grundschutz framework and operate applications in their own data centres or with local IT service providers. You should therefore check whether the solution can be operated on-premises or in a private cloud hosted by your service provider. Whether a solution is authorised for classified information – for example, at the ‘VS-NfD’ classification level – is a separate issue and must be clarified individually.
For public authorities and organisations with security responsibilities, operational communications are an additional consideration. A messaging app does not replace the digital radio system in this context, but it can complement it: with photos and documents from the scene of the incident, real-time locations of emergency services personnel, augmented reality, or the alerting of staff outside the radio network.
Teamwire as an example of a secure alternative to WhatsApp
Teamwire is the author of this article and is featured here as a specific product example. The overview ranks Teamwire against the ten criteria so you can compare the details directly with your requirements and other providers.
| Selection criterion | Teamwire as an example |
| Hosting and data control | Operates in the public cloud with a data centre in Germany, in a private cloud or on-premises. BSI-C5-certified hosting in the public cloud, with no reliance on US providers. |
| Suitability for day-to-day use | Works just like WhatsApp; apps available for iOS, Android, Linux, desktop and web browsers. Group and broadcast chats with up to 2,500 participants, photos, files, voice messages and polls. |
| Administration and user lifecycle | Centralised management via the dashboard. Admin-controlled user groups and rights management – anyone removed from a group is automatically removed from all associated chats. |
| Identity and login | Set up using your work email address; no need for a personal telephone number. Synchronisation with the company directory via LDAP. |
| Devices and BYOD | Business data is stored in an encrypted, isolated container within the app. Support for MDM/UEM and registration tokens restrict use to authorised devices. |
| Security and evidence | ISO 27001 certified, BSI C5 certificate. Encryption during transmission and storage, configurable communication policies (e.g. internal use only or within specific groups only) |
| Archiving and audit | Archiving and exporting chat histories via the dashboard, with storage periods that can be set separately on the server and on the end device. Audit logs record all activities. |
| Integrations and interoperability | APIs and SDKs for integrating third-party systems and bots. Communication with other organisations is possible via federation, with each organisation retaining control over its own data. |
| Emergency and operational communications | Can be used as an independent fallback channel outside the organisation’s own IT infrastructure. Alarm notifications are delivered with sound even when chats are muted and can override silent mode. Features also include emergency calls with location, push-to-talk, live locations, augmented reality and much more. |
| Support and service levels | Teamwire offers English- and German-language support with dedicated contact persons. |
👉 More details on Teamwire as an alternative to WhatsApp
👉 Detailed product overview
👉 All the information you need about security at Teamwire
Proof of Concept: Check whether the solution fits into your day-to-day work
Any shortlist should be tested in a realistic proof of concept (PoC). Data sheets show what a solution is capable of. Only testing will reveal whether your staff will actually use it instead of WhatsApp. To this end, set out five points in advance:
- Objectives: What is the test intended to demonstrate?
- Scenarios: Which typical and critical processes will be tested, such as a shift change or a simulated cyber-attack?
- Participants: Which roles and user groups need to be involved, including mobile teams without a fixed workstation?
- Success criteria: How will you know that the PoC was successful?
- Evaluation: What feedback, technical findings and outstanding issues will be taken into account in the decision?
As well as the features, test the administration, devices, integrations and actual workflows.
The article ‘How to carry out a successful proof of concept for the roll-out of Teamwire’ outlines a possible process and provides an evaluation checklist.
Checklist: 11 questions for selection and a pilot project
- Which communication processes need to be mapped?
- What hosting and data control requirements apply, and what evidence (AVV, C5 certificate, ISO 27001) do you need?
- Is the solution as simple as WhatsApp for your user groups, and how will it be rolled out?
- How are users, groups and permissions managed centrally, including when staff leave the organisation?
- Which directory and login procedures must be supported?
- How are BYOD and lost devices handled?
What security measures and audits does the provider document, and for what scope? - What content must be retained, exported or deleted, and within what timeframes?
- What integrations and interfaces are required?
- What must continue to function during disruptions or exceptional circumstances, even if your own IT systems fail?
- What support and service levels does your organisation require?
Conclusion: Requirements first, product second
The search for a WhatsApp alternative for businesses usually begins with a specific problem: WhatsApp is being used in an uncontrolled manner for internal coordination. Issues such as contact synchronisation, a lack of management and a lack of archiving cannot be resolved by guidelines alone.
You can find the right alternative by first defining your communication needs, operational requirements and governance, then reviewing provider details and testing your shortlist in a proof of concept (PoC).
Teamwire demonstrates how a communication platform can combine a WhatsApp-like user experience with centralised administration, various operating models and features for emergency situations. Whether this is suitable for your situation depends on how well it aligns with your requirements.
If you are interested in the topic of WhatsApp and other consumer messaging apps for business communication, we recommend the following articles on our blog:
- WhatsApp & the GDPR: What businesses need to bear in mind
- WhatsApp for staff communication: What companies need to bear in mind
- The disadvantages of WhatsApp in a business setting: a 10-point overview
- WhatsApp ban at work: How to put clear rules in place
- Signal at work: Where the secure private messaging app reaches its limits
Would you like to know how your organisation communicates if email and internal systems fail? The free guide ‘Communication in a State of Emergency’ shows you how to set up a resilient fallback channel:
And if you’d like to find out more about Teamwire or try it out to see if it suits your specific needs, book a free, no-obligation demo:
Frequently asked questions (FAQs)
What is a WhatsApp alternative for businesses and public authorities?
A WhatsApp alternative for businesses and public authorities is a messaging service for internal communication that combines a WhatsApp-like user experience with centralised management, business identities, controlled data storage and archiving. Unlike WhatsApp, it is controlled by the organisation, not by individual users.
What is the difference between WhatsApp Business and a WhatsApp alternative for businesses?
WhatsApp Business is designed for communicating with customers. A WhatsApp alternative for businesses is intended for internal communication and offers centralised management, business identities, controlled data storage and archiving.
What criteria should a company consider when looking for a WhatsApp alternative?
Key criteria include the specific area of application, hosting and data control, user management, identity and device management, security, integrations, documentation, availability, contingency measures and support. Which of these are crucial depends on your own processes and requirements.
Which hosting models are suitable for businesses?
Depending on the provider and organisation, public cloud, private cloud or on-premises solutions may be appropriate. Compare not only the name of the model, but also data flows, responsibilities, operational costs and contractual terms.
Does a business or public sector solution require a private telephone number?
That depends on the product. Organisations should check whether users can be set up and managed using a business identity. Check the information provided by the relevant provider and clarify whether employees must provide their personal telephone number for this purpose.
How can you assess whether a solution is right for the company?
A proof of concept with pre-defined objectives, scenarios and success criteria is suitable for this purpose. In addition to user interaction, you should also test administration, device configuration, integrations and procedures in the event of faults.
Is a WhatsApp alternative automatically GDPR-compliant?
No. The data protection assessment depends, amongst other things, on the product, configuration, contract and specific use. You can find a general overview in the article ‘WhatsApp and the GDPR: What businesses need to bear in mind’.